Submitting your good work to the knowledge base is easy. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

Analysisprograms" PBoris Notkin invites" And" Man in the rain"

1. Interview

1.1 Interview - general information

Interview (from English, interview - literally meeting, conversation) is a genre of journalism, which is a conversation between a journalist and a socially significant person on current issues.

The television interview went even further, enriching the genre with an essential quality - entertainment. Due to the audiovisual nature of television communication, the source of information becomes not only the spoken speech with all the richness of its rhetoric, intonation, emotional coloring (as on the radio), but also facial expressions, gestures, behavior of the interlocutors, and often their environment (interior of the room, landscape , surrounding people, etc.). It is entertainment that explains the special authenticity and, as a consequence, the widespread popularity of the interview genre in television programs.

As many experienced interviewers rightly warn, in order to get to the deepest personality traits of the interlocutor, a special mental attitude is required from the interviewer. Otherwise, everything will seem to be right, maybe even at ease, but it will not excite, touch, or evoke reciprocal feelings.

A common mistake novice interviewers make is the belief that asking is easier than answering. No, an interview is a joint creation. Its success largely depends on the leader. In his questions to his interlocutor, the journalist seems to anticipate what the readers, radio listeners, and television viewers themselves would like to ask. And for this, the interviewer must prepare for the conversation: outline a preliminary list of questions based on familiarity with the dossier (if any, if the interlocutor is sufficiently well-known, on the Internet or in the help desk of the television company), with the previous statements of the interlocutor; It can be useful to ask about him, his habits and incidents from the life of various knowledgeable people - colleagues, family members.

Interviews as a genre occupy a special place on the television screen. In fact, there is not a single news release where journalists do not ask questions to competent people, or address participants in various events, or inquire about the opinions of others about certain important events. Interviews are an essential element of many complex television forms. Less often it is used to create an independent transmission.

Depending on the task set by the journalist, a distinction is made between an opinion interview (a statement on some matter) and a fact interview (a report about something known to a given person).

The interview genre is used only when the interviewee can say more than the journalist, or when the interviewee, through his speech, supports a certain public campaign, if the issue is in the center of attention of many people and their views need to be clarified. Interviewees are traditionally divided into three categories:

The purposes of interviews of the first and second categories overlap to some extent; many prominent individuals are experts in their field. For example, a well-known politician, speaking as an official on some aspects of his party's policies, may reveal his personality during an interview.

Ideally, an on-screen interview (except in a formal situation) should look like a casual conversation between two people, one of whom is more knowledgeable about the topic being discussed. But these people could just talk without being in a studio pavilion, without cameras and lighting equipment. Therefore, in the very nature of television dialogue there is a certain duality.

A portrait interview is a special type of television interview with the goal of revealing the personality of the interlocutor as comprehensively as possible. Social and psychological emotional characteristics and identification of the interviewee’s value system acquire primary importance. Often appears as an integral part of a screen sketch.

The informational interview is the most common form of on-screen dialogue. In any case, in news releases, the vast majority of meetings between journalists and their interlocutors take place with the goal of obtaining specific information from a person who has the necessary information. Most often, such interviews perform two interrelated tasks: obtaining socially significant information plus identifying some personality traits of the bearer of this information.

In a good informational interview, each question is individualized, designed specifically for the person with whom the journalist is talking in this particular case. Sometimes naive sentences like “please tell us something about...” sounding on the screen are evidence of the journalist’s unpreparedness for an interview.

An informational interview for his leading journalist does not at all mean obtaining information that is completely new to him. A professional usually knows basically what he will hear in response, and conducts the conversation clearly, thoughtfully. This, as we have already emphasized, does not mean at all that the interlocutors discussed all the questions that will be asked before the shooting. On-screen questions are never, under any circumstances, communicated to the interviewee during the preparation of an informational interview, at least in the same wording as will be heard on camera. Otherwise, the element of improvisation, the phenomenon of a word being born before the eyes of television viewers, will be lost, without which a television interview will lose the flavor of novelty, spontaneity, and naturalness, so necessary for a full viewer’s perception.

1.2 About TV interviews

“A journalist receives the necessary information by being present at important events, getting acquainted with documents and other sources, but, above all, by communicating with people who are carriers of information. Any process of human communication, as a rule, takes place in the form of dialogue - questions and answers.

The genres of television journalism, in which the main visual and expressive means is the word, living human speech, and the form of existence is dialogue (communication), are of particular importance for television, since the communicative process, expressed primarily by speech with the addition of facial expressions and pantomimes, is one of the foundations of television as a social system, directly corresponding to the nature of the screen.

Interview (from the English interview - literally meeting, conversation) is a genre of journalism, which is a conversation between a journalist and a socially significant person on current issues.

Interviews are very popular as a genre and method of collecting information.

When you read interviews published in a newspaper or magazine, you, of course, get some idea about the personality of the person being interviewed. But, firstly, this representation may not be accurate, since you will learn what this person said not directly from him, but through the interviewer who put his words on paper. Secondly, even this idea relates more to the intellectual component of a person’s personality; his physical individuality is hidden from the reader. In radio broadcasts the situation is almost the same. “Almost” and not “exactly the same” because the voice is still part of the physical essence of a person. Directly, sensually perceiving, listening to a living voice, you receive some information about the physical individuality of a person: after all, this or that timbre of the voice, the richness or poverty of intonations, the manner of speaking - all this in itself tells the listener additional information about the speaker. Sometimes, regardless of the content of the speech, regardless of what a person says, just by the way he speaks, you can understand not only that he is young or old, but also find out whether he is an intelligent person, whether he is cheerful or boring, good-natured or gloomy. You can judge his attitude towards people, the degree of his openness, sincerity, i.e. about spiritual traits.

When the face of this person with all shades of emotion is before your eyes, the impression that he and his story makes on you is intensified many times over. A psychological mechanism begins to work, which scientists call the “filter of trust and mistrust.” If a person’s appearance overcomes this filter that exists in our consciousness, the impact of speech increases many times over, and the effect of suggestion begins to take effect, which is sometimes stronger than logical arguments.

The main, decisive difference between radio broadcasting and television is that radio affects only a person’s hearing, while television also affects his vision.

A television interview is a genre of journalism that involves a conversation between a journalist and a political, public or other figure on current issues in front of the camera. 2-3 persons can take part in the interview. Of course, television interviews have an undeniable advantage - visual possibilities. “An interview on television is extremely laconic (action, movement, speech - the spring of dialogue). The main thing that is required of a journalist in an interview is the ability to think publicly. Questions are asked not protocol, but in a live dialogue.”

2. Program reviews

2.1 About the program “Boris Notkin Invites”

The genre of the program “Boris Notkin Invites” is an interview. Popular actors, politicians, athletes, and statesmen come to visit the famous presenter.

The host often asks his guests how they achieved success, overcame difficulties and obstacles, what helped them find their own path. Much attention is paid in the program to the hero’s personal life: childhood impressions, relationships with the opposite sex, taste preferences and even a sense of humor. In this colorful mosaic, if desired, you can see role models in everyday life and profession, way of thinking and behavior.

Extensive journalistic experience and an invariably friendly attitude towards guests allow the presenter to touch on almost any topic in conversations.

2.2 MastersTin Boris Notkin as an interviewer

“When a conversation takes place in a pleasant and cozy atmosphere, it literally opens up the interlocutors to various kinds of revelations regarding their personal lives and individual preferences. The program “Boris Notkin Invites” creates just such an atmosphere in which every studio guest feels peace and comfort, in which this fascinating conversation will take place.

This program is one of the varieties of interviews, during which a fruitful dialogue begins between the host and the guest, pleasantly pleasing a large audience of television viewers.

The guests tell us exactly what factors contributed to such rapid progress along the ladder of success. The issue of personal life, aesthetic, taste and other preferences of each new guest does not go unnoticed. TV viewers who choose this particular program, which resembles a colorful mosaic of interesting facts, can find a role model that will help them make the main choice regarding life, profession and way of thinking. All of these people have achieved certain successes and are fully ready to help every modern TV viewer who is going through a difficult period of doubt find their way. (Oleg Kondratyuk)"

I agree with the author of this publication, but for an interesting and deep interview there are few external factors. Therefore, it is important that a journalist does not strive for sensation or high ratings, but strives for the greatest objectivity in presenting the facts. And this program is no exception. If you analyze this transmission, you will notice that both factors are present in it. We will try to look at it from the inside: analyze and identify what representation techniques Boris Notkin uses.

The method we will use is the observation method. Observation is the first stage of crystallization of a visual image and allows you to highlight the features of the paint layer, designate the shape and background, as well as extrapolate and identify the characters. In our case, the observation method allows us to highlight the features of the values ​​on which Boris Isaevich relies in his program.

One of the techniques that Boris Notkin uses in his program is comparison: “<…>And then you could do nothing for 3 months...

In order not to be a parasite...

So I was lying on the sofa, lying around. My dad already told me: “You should already do something. Why lie around like this all summer?” So the musicians from the restaurant came to me: “Kol, maybe you can sing with us while you’re not doing anything?” I agreed, and then one day I went on stage and started singing<…>" Here you can see how Notkin compares Nikolai Noskov to a parasite in order to provoke his response and thereby provoke him to continue the conversation. Namely, thanks to this technique, we see how the hero of the program represents the value of “work” and, in general, his attitude towards work and work.

Boris Isaevich asks about the guest’s parents in all interviews. In this question, one way or another, the topic of labor is touched upon. Since the heroes of the program talk not only about relationships with their parents, but also about their lives, including work:

“Mark, tell us about your parents.

They are wonderful people; people who work hard. And it has been like this all my life, as far as I remember. My parents were at work from morning to evening. But at the same time, my brother and I were not ownerless either. My mother is a doctor and still works at City Hospital 71 in Moscow.”

Sometimes Notkin uses associations. For example, in the same interview with Mark Tishman, Boris Isaevich asks Mark about his mother’s daily schedule, but it is clear that with this question he wants to show his respect for hardworking people:

Is it true that she gets up every morning at 6 am, leaves at 7, and returns at 10 pm?

It’s absolutely true, and that’s why it often hurts me to watch on the news, on TV, when such big companies rise up, and our doctors are so different, and behind them there is an eye, and an eye. I understand that doctors are different. But following the example of my mother, I have been to her hospital more than once. I see that these are simply holy people, especially compared to the people I meet in show business. These are holy people who work hard.”

Boris Notkin also includes in the program such a technique as the use of direct text:

“How did Vika manage to re-educate you like that? Because after the army you didn’t work anywhere for six months, and now you’re such a workaholic.

Yes, I've always been a workaholic!

Six months of doing nothing with girlfriends.

Ts, I tried to do something... I went to all the castings, I wanted to work, I really wanted to work. And that's how I was taught. I have a record - I didn’t leave the theater institute for 15 days. I became a workaholic at the Shchukin Theater Institute. Because during the day we studied, and at night we rehearsed for independent passages” (Interview with Anton Makarsky)

This technique is the most common. Since there is no need to use any tricks in order to get a complete answer to the question asked.

Thanks to the variety of techniques that Notkin uses, the questions are always varied and correct. This allows the viewer to fully appreciate the character’s personality from various angles.

2.3 About the program “Man in the Rain”

This program also relies on the interview method. But the purpose of this program is completely different. If Boris Notkin in his program devotes most of the time to the personality of the guest, then in the program “Man in the Rain” the main goal is to discuss some important problem for society.

The personality of the guest is very important for the viewer, because the audience wants to know the opinion of a competent person. But here no special attention is paid to the family and personal characteristics of the interviewee.

If in the program “Boris Notkin Invites” the presenter is assigned an important role, he can not only ask questions, but also comment and joke, then in the program “Man in the Rain” the role of the presenter is relegated to the background. But despite this, the program always turns out to be informative and dynamic.

2.4 Comparative analysis of programs“Boris Notkin invites”and "The Man Under"rain"

Everyone knows that the success of a program or interview depends on the host. In his questions to his interlocutor, the journalist seems to anticipate what the readers, radio listeners, and television viewers themselves would like to ask.

In the program “Boris Notkin Invites,” the presenter himself makes direct references to the audience’s desire to hear an answer to any answer that interests them.

Boris Notkin: But seriously, the viewer is interested in: what do you value in a woman? Do you believe in friendship between a man and a woman?

In the “Man in the Rain” program, the presenters do not make reference to the audience; the journalist himself is a spectator of what is happening, so the questions he asks are relevant to everyone. Sometimes this concerns the personality of the hero of the program, but we encounter this every day, and our attention focuses on such issues.

Mongait: How do you limit yourself in food? Here you are personally, and in principle, what is, in your opinion, that taboo that definitely cannot be broken?

Chenault: I am already 70 years old, and I must take into account the peculiarities of the functioning of the heart, lungs, and intestines at the age of 70. The best thing for me: for breakfast - a lot of green tea with fruit, and I have breakfast very early. For lunch, first, be sure to have a large portion of salad, because at least six hours have passed since breakfast. Hunger is a nervous phenomenon. Chewing the salad, you begin to calm down a little. Then - definitely carbohydrates: rice or pasta. In the evening I eat vegetable soup - I generally really like vegetable soups - and something protein: fish, chicken, sometimes even meat. This is normal nutrition for me. But I definitely give myself three days of detox a month.

Mongait: I would like to ask you a few questions in blitz mode, that is, short ones related to cliches in the mass consciousness. For example, we believe that coffee is harmful. Is it really harmful?

Interviewees are traditionally divided into three categories:

1) political and government officials, specialists and other people with specific knowledge in a particular area; they are interviewed to find out about something;

2) celebrities who are interviewed so that details of their lives and activities become known to the general public;

3) ordinary people whom we meet at home, on the street, at work; they are interviewed to find out public opinion about a particular event.

In both programs, only the first two categories are present.

Programs differ in their goals. And depending on this, the hosts have to select guests.

3. Moral values ​​in programs on the Dozhd and TV Center TV channels

Now let’s look at the definition of “moral values” and how they are arranged in programs on the Dozhd and TV Center TV channels.

Moral values ​​are rules of behavior in a social environment that are optimal for maintaining stability in it and giving everyone equal opportunities for individual development. In other words, these are the main laws of community life. Their violation leads to the collapse of society or degeneration. Moral values ​​are based on human feelings, not on reason.

The space of moral relations is extremely vast; it embraces all spheres of a person’s inner world and all areas of his external social relations. Always and everywhere a person can or should strive to behave morally, although we are not always absolutely sure of the beneficialness of our moral act or that we acted in the best way, since we often make a choice between different moral values, inevitably bringing some of them are sacrificed to others. The catalog of moral values ​​is made up of those realities and actions that we not only evaluate, but approve of, i.e. we evaluate them as kind, good, good, etc. It includes the qualities of humanity, which constitute the position of the individual, the natural basis of his morality, as well as moral principles and norms of behavior, which are determined by the qualities of a person. P. Kurtz in the work “Forbidden Fruit. Ethics of Humanism" offers the following catalog of general moral standards: honesty, truthfulness, commitment, sincerity, fidelity, devotion, reliability, benevolence, benevolence, non-harm to others, non-damage to private or public property, consent to sexual relations, beneficence, decency, gratitude , responsibility, justice, tolerance, cooperation.

3.1 Moral values ​​in the program “Boris Notkin Invites”

In the program “Boris Notkin Invites” one can highlight such human needs as family, love, relationships with women, work, success, human relationships. On their basis, it is possible to determine the moral values ​​on which the presenter relies when creating the program.

Therefore, we will consider human needs in Boris Notkin's program; and establish a connection between needs and moral values.

The value of family plays an important role in the “Boris Notkin Invites” program. Almost all interviews begin with questions about the family: “Mark, tell us about your parents”, “You were brought up in some indecently positive way: you don’t smoke, don’t drink, don’t swear - what was your childhood like?”, “You also told , that dad was upset by the choice of your specialty, he said: “I would like Efim to have a profession that is easier in the zone” ....”

Sometimes in the program it turns out that no matter how the conversation begins, everything still rests on the family. For example, in an interview with Nikolai Noskov, Boris Notkin asked about the singer’s acquaintance with his future wife. But the conversation still touched on the topic of family:

“But you, apparently, adhere to the old principles, because 30 years ago you met Marina in a restaurant in Cherepovets and are still faithful to her.

I try, I try (laughs). But the fact is that for me it most likely comes from my family. I have such an Old Believer family, and in our dining room in the red corner, back in those Soviet times, when it was all legal and prohibited, John the Baptist still stood. My grandmother kept very strict fasts - water and porridge. And Easter was our most serious holiday. Children's birthdays were practically not celebrated, but only when I was probably 14 years old did my father allow me to celebrate birthdays. But we need to celebrate God’s birthday, and when a person celebrates his birthday, it’s also so chic, i.e. someone should celebrate your birthday, not you. Then it’s right.” (Interview with Nikolai Noskov)

“- There is a statement that every man subconsciously looks for similarities with his mother in his wife. What was your mother like?

Mom was a unique person: she was beautiful, she was smart, she was very open and very kind. She helped people. In terms of her psychology, she was such a Christian person, as she should be according to the Bible. And if I look for something similar, similar to me, the search will not end in anything. And I had the same grandmother, uh, in general - my parents’ parents, so... Yes, my aunt, my mother’s sister, has a theory that neither I nor my nephew will, uh, get married in the near future. Because we always have before us the ideal of some kind of family relationship that existed.” (Interview with Maxim Galkin).

No less important are the value of love and relationships with women. Most often, these two concepts overlap. Judging by the questions Boris Notkin asks: - But seriously, the viewer is interested in: what do you value in a woman? “Do you believe in friendship between a man and a woman?”, it can be assumed that the theme of love is one of the main themes.

There are also questions that themselves touch on the topic of love and women:

“- And once is necessary. Then it's fate. And what is it about Marina that hooked you for life?

She is a truly Russian woman. Character, loyalty, devotion, selfless love. To a loved one, eternal concern about him, and she is very beautiful, simply beautiful.” (Interview with Nikolai Noskov).

“Now I understand why you refused to give comments about love to one publication. You said: “No Kama Sutra can teach love.”

Now I understand that my opinion will not change anything. Because in such complex and subtle issues, and always very personal, like love and attraction, I will not reveal anything new in this case.”

Also, the program is not complete without questions about labor and work, because the guests who come to the program are people who have achieved success in any field of activity, be it music, politics, cinema, theater, etc.

Labor is usually understood as “purposeful human activity aimed at creating material and spiritual benefits.”

Boris Isaevich always finds out how the hero of the program achieved success, whether there are any secrets of success. Let's take a closer look at this value.

Not every episode of the program has the host asking questions about success. But guests often mention this themselves:

“Well, absolutely, it has improved. And, before I was a famous person, I was quite boring and self-doubting. And when, well, when some kind of success came, I began to doubt myself less, it helped me in life. When I enter some hypermarket, and there is a security guard, it was just recently, the day before yesterday, the security guard is standing, and the woman who is cleaning there, there is also a salesperson - oh, how glad we are to see you, we are so pleased, naturally, this brings some kind of light and joy into life, and, uh, I, to be honest, can’t imagine life without it.” (Interview with Maxim Galkin).

“They don’t invite me to Dagestan, yes. Unfortunately, I can’t say anything here. No, I love Dagestan, I really love Moscow, I adore it. Of course, this is now my city to a greater extent, because my conscious life is in Moscow, my first love is connected with it, there are such favorite places, some of my successes are connected with this. I had 5 years at GITIS, I believe that during these years I began to develop as a person: performances, first tours. This is also Moscow, so Moscow is already my hometown.” (Interview with Mark Tishman).

Sometimes Notkin asks questions that are completely unrelated to any value, for example, the value of “success,” but such questions help the hero reveal the “secret of his success” to the audience:

«- I know that you have read a lot of books on psychology and are trying to change yourself.

Tabletop psychology was very interesting to me. And now I’m interested in it, but unfortunately I can’t pay as much attention to it anymore. I had to change a lot in myself during my sports career. I am quite explosive, quite hot-tempered. Now this is less, much less. And I have always defended my position, by any means. It seemed to me that you should always fight for the truth right here... without paying attention to anything! Now, of course, I am sure that we need to fight for the truth, but there are different ways, and you can approach the same problem in different ways. And truth can be approached in different ways. You need to try to think ahead about success. Those. do not think about where the disadvantages will be, but try to create an atmosphere of success in your head, i.e. this must end well! Even if there are some small deviations, this does not mean that it is a failure. It is impossible to achieve success without seeing some disappointments along the way. And therefore this feeling of success is very important to develop in yourself. Success in life, success in tomorrow, success in what you do. And it seems to me that it gives you strength and it puts you on the path that leads you to this very success.”

And one more aspect that is touched upon in the program is human relationships: friends, colleagues, relatives, etc.: “They say that you are especially good in company, unlike many other clowns, comedians, jesters who in life - gloomy, in life you are a very cheerful and joyful person”, “-Personally, this is not at all interesting to me, but the audience will not understand me if I don’t ask a question, if I don’t ask about your friendship with Alla Borisovna”, “- That there is “Two stars” you won exclusively for Nona Grishaeva, who is very upset when she does not receive the highest scores,” etc.

Boris Notkin always expresses his opinion and attitude towards something. The interview is conducted in a friendly format. And therefore, if opinions do not coincide, then Notkin will not miss the chance to talk about it: “You and I have completely different personal experiences, you say that you do not believe in friendship between a man and a woman, but on the contrary, my best friends are women.” , “Valentin Yudashkin has a good nose for talent. He invited you to write a song for his fashion show on March 8,” “I think this is especially important for you, because all the newspapers call you: the most eligible bachelor in Russia. Won't you marry a witch" - this makes the program interesting and lively.

The program is structured in the form of a dialogue between the host and the guest. During the conversation, the personality of the interviewee, his family, career, position in society and social problems are discussed. Previously, Boris Isaevich invited only ministers, oligarchs, and generals to the studio. He liked to talk about macroeconomics, geopolitics... Now the guests are mainly actors, composers, athletes, and musicians.

Boris Notkin says about this: “I stopped giving my own assessments because at some point I caught myself thinking: I am annoyed by amateurs imposing their opinions where it is better to listen to the opinion of a specialist. And the respectable public has lost interest in their bosses, and the officials themselves recall the times of glasnost with disgust and are not eager to appear on screen.”

3.2 Moral values ​​in the program “Man in the Rain”

“Boris Notkin Invites” and “Man in the Rain”? programs whose core is interviews. But despite this, they are completely different. The goals, objectives, and moral values ​​on which the programs are based are different.

We have already examined the values ​​that Boris Notkin relies on in his program, now we need to consider them in the “Man in the Rain” program. This will allow us to find out not only the goals of the program and the presenter, but also to compare even the policies of the TV Center and Dozhd channels.

The presenter in "Man in the Rain" plays the role of a journalist, not an interlocutor. Presenters almost never express their opinions. The only thing they allow themselves to do is ask tricky questions, which the interviewees are not always willing to answer or do not answer at all.

Zhelnov: Regarding Mikhail Chernov, regarding the settlement agreement, the Vedomosti newspaper wrote in its column that thanks to this settlement agreement, we will never know the alternative biography of Oleg Deripaska and your true path to empire, to wealth.

Deripaska: You know, the Vedomosti newspaper is generally a shallow newspaper, I strongly advise the Dozhd channel not to go down this path. We have already said that we will not comment on this.

Zhelnov: Are you happy with the result that there was a settlement agreement?

Deripaska: We agreed that we would not comment.

The host of the program is not one person. In each program you can see something new, because interviews take place not in the studio, but in completely different places, such as a gym, a cafe, etc. The main goal of the program is relevance and topicality. The hosts invite guests who can comment on any political or economic situation in Russia and the world, as well as professionals in various fields.

Despite this, we will try to identify the moral values ​​contained in the program.

Several times the presenters invited nutritionists to the program. They were asked a variety of questions, but almost the entire program was built on such a human need as health.

Mongait: I know that people who today in modern culture are usually called celebrities come to your clinics, for example, former Georgian President Saakashvili, the famous Russian oligarch Elena Baturina, Silvio Berlusconi himself. Why are they coming to you?

Chenault: We are engaged in prevention and even health forecasting. Prevention involves preventing possible problems. Nutrigenetics and DNA-level research play a significant role in forecasting. In some cases, it is possible to predict what might happen after, say, 7 years, and we try to influence this and give advice for the future. For 8 days we study a person, examine his reactions. Our laboratory finds out how capable he is of recovery, how solvable his problems are, and then we give a number of recommendations: what to do after leaving the clinic. We have an individual approach, we study genetic properties and the ability to regenerate.

Mongait: I read in your various interviews that you criticize some popular diets. Right now, the Dukan diet is considered one of the most popular diets in Russia. You call it almost a stimulus for the development of cancer. Why?

Also, very often without delving into the personality of the hero, the presenters still touch on such a value as family.

Mirzaev: What should I tell them, judging like this? They cannot return their son, and I, as a father, know these feelings. He won't come back, I don't know what to tell them.

Belogolovtsev: Now I, as the father of a little daughter, will ask you - how did they explain to her what was happening to you? What does she know now?

Mirzaev: She is now 3.5 years old. She saw on TV, when they took her to me, she said: “Let go of my dad, bad guys!” The first time I came out, she hugged me tightly, looked into my eyes and cried. The child is 3.5 years old, he doesn’t seem to understand anything, but she looks at me, hugs me and says: “Dad, dad,” and does not let me go.

A very common question is the attitude towards Russian politicians and their activities. For example, in the issue dated February 1, 2013.

Zhelnov: You have encountered Dmitry Medvedev here again. He told Bloomberg that Sergei Magnitsky was a simple accountant and was simply protecting his executives who were involved in illegal business transactions in Russia. Were you surprised by Medvedev's reaction?

Browder: No, the reaction did not surprise me, since this was the position of Putin and Medvedev from the very beginning. They want to hide the facts, namely that Sergei Magnitsky revealed the theft of $230 million from the state by corrupt officials. He presented this fact to the Investigative Committee, as a result of which he was arrested, he was tortured first for three, and then for 58 days, and was killed. This murder is undeniable, and everyone in Russia knows about it.

Zhelnov: In 2007, here you asked Medvedev to help you with a visa, and he responded and said that he would consider the documents. Why has Medvedev’s position changed so much over the past 6 years?

Browder: In 2007, I spoke to Medvedev at a business dinner, he was not ready for my request, and there were enough press representatives there. I asked him a personal question: my visa was suspended, could you help me restore it. He looked around the room, all the people who witnessed this conversation, and, since at that time he was trying to strengthen his authority in the West, he said: yes, I will help you with a visa. I should note that at that time a criminal case had not yet been initiated against me. It was opened only when we reported the theft of our companies to the police and gave the names of the policemen, and it was these policemen who then opened a criminal case against me.

The questions asked by the presenters allowed the viewer to evaluate not only the work of the guest, but also his personality. And also thanks to this, we see what moral values ​​are embedded in these programs.

The main moral value in the Man in the Rain program is honesty.

Interviewees are forced to answer all questions honestly, but when it comes to discussing topics that are unpleasant to them, they openly state that they do not want to talk about it. Journalists sometimes try to verify the honesty of the invitee, ask clarifying questions, etc.

Belogolovtsev: The Russian Championship is your first tournament, how did the fans react to you?

Mirzaev: Honestly?

Belogolovtsev: Honestly.

Mirzaev: When I fight, I don’t hear what’s going on, but I was told that the public was against me. They shouted: “Break him!” When I was losing 9:0 in the second fight, there was a minute left, I didn’t hear, I was all in the fight, and then they told me that the audience stood up and shouted: “Break him!” When the fight ended, I strangled my opponent, and silence immediately fell.

Belogolovtsev: Was there any contact with the fans after the fight, signing autographs, or, on the contrary, did they avoid you?

Mirzaev: One guy came up to me, he was connected with the second fight, I kicked out his student, he later admitted to me that they were preparing him purely for me. Such a healthy man, with a full beard, he comes up to me and says, shaking my hand: “I would do the same,” and I tell him: “Let’s not talk about this, please.”

Belogolovtsev: If you evaluate yourself as a percentage of the ideal Rasul Mirzaev, what percentage do you have now?

Mirzaev: 50% and still 50 left.

Justice? it is the second value that dominates the program.

Guests of the program are often controversial and extraordinary personalities. Viewers have a preconceived notion about such people, and sometimes such an interview causes a huge public outcry. For example, oligarchs, about whom the audience thinks not as successful, hardworking people, but as cunning, deceitful thieves. But during the interview, the heroes reveal all their cards and reveal the truth about many events in the country:

"Zhelnov: You claim that Russia is corrupt, but at the same time in Russia you were involved in, in addition to buying shares, investigative audits. Thanks to you, the former leadership of Gazprom, headed by Rem Vyakhirev, resigned. Were you also part of that system then? Without a decision from above, no one could dismiss Vyakhirev. Did you work for someone, in someone else's interests?

Browder: In the 1990s, the most important problem in Russia was that 22 oligarchs stole more than 50 percent of the country from the people, while the remaining 145 million people lived in deep poverty. Nurses had to sell themselves, professors had to become taxi drivers. This was a humiliation of Russia, and everyone who had a heart and who saw this happening wanted it to stop as quickly as possible. When Putin came to power, he declared that he would bring order to the country and take away money and power from the oligarchs. And I, like everyone in Russia, thought, thank God, someone will solve this problem. And when Putin came to power, and I was exposing corruption in Gazprom, I was fighting the same people as him - the oligarchs, including Rem Vyakhirev, and our interests coincided from 2000 to 2004, while he was trying to win his war with the oligarchs . But I didn’t understand that after Khodorkovsky’s arrest, he won his war with the oligarchs and himself became the biggest oligarch. From that moment on, the situation began to deteriorate."

And the audience is then divided into two parts: those who found something new and changed their minds, and those who remained with the same point of view.

The choice of certain moral values ​​depends on the goals set by the presenters of the programs.

Conclusion

An interview is a genre of journalism, which is a conversation between a journalist and a socially significant person on current issues.

Entertainment explains the special authenticity and, as a consequence, the widespread popularity of the interview genre in television programs.

“Boris Notkin Invites” and “Man in the Rain”? programs, the core of which is interviews. But despite this, they are completely different. The goals, objectives, and moral values ​​on which the programs are based are different.

In the course of the study, we were able to find out what moral values ​​the presenters rely on when building a program.

In the program “Boris Notkin Invites” this is loyalty, devotion, decency, cooperation, beneficence. But for the hosts of the “Man in the Rain” program, other moral values ​​are important: honesty, reliability, benevolence, justice, responsibility.

The choice of certain moral values ​​depends on the tasks set by the presenters of the programs.

The programs also differ in their goals. And depending on this, the hosts have to select guests.

Most often these are: political and government officials, specialists and other people with specific knowledge in a particular area; they are interviewed to find out about something or celebrities are interviewed so that details of their lives and activities become known to the general public;

In the program “Boris Notkin Invites” the goal is to introduce us or reveal the identity of the interviewee.

The hosts of “Man in the Rain” set a completely different goal - to show all sides of any problematic situation. Invited guests are competent on a specific issue.

This is why interviews are received differently. This is a portrait interview with Boris Notkin. And “Man in the Rain” is more like an informational or problem interview.

References

interviewer notkin man rain

1. Television journalism. Textbook / Ed. Col.: G.V. Kuznetsov, V.L. Tsvik, A.Ya. Yurovsky. 4th edition. - M.: Moscow State University, Higher School, 2002 // http://evartist.narod.ru/text6/23.htm

2. Golanova E.I. Oral public dialogue: interview genre // Russian language of the late 20th century. M., 2000

3. Interview technology. MM. Lukina. M.: Aspect Press, 2003. - 191 p.

http://sch1636.ru/_/book/luk/Index.htm

4. Voroshilov V.V. Journalism. St. Petersburg, 1999.

5. Tertychny A.A. Genres of periodicals: Textbook/A.A. Tertychny. - 2nd ed., rev. and additional - M.: Aspect Press, 2002. - 320 p.

6. “Boris Notkin has been inviting for 10 years.” Newspaper "Culture" 03/10/2009

7. Sahakyan A.K. Sociocultural conditionality of the value of work. // Bulletin of KRSU. 2011. Volume 11, No. 2, p. 156

8. Kim M.N. Technology for creating a journalistic work. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of Mikhailov V.A., 2001.

9. Tsvik V.L. Television journalism: History, theory, practice. M.: Aspect-Press, 2004.

Posted on Allbest.ru

Similar documents

The creative path of A. Pimanov. General characteristics of the program "Man and the Law". Main trends in the development of analytical programs on television. Journalistic skills of presenter Alexey Pimanov. Incompetence of leading analytical programs.

course work, added 12/17/2009


Specific features of modeling television programs. Using methods of television influence on the consciousness of the television audience when creating cultural programs. Features of the compositional structure of television entertainment show programs.

thesis, added 08/28/2010


Features of information and analytical television programs. Defining their artistic originality. The history of the formation and development of the genre on domestic television. Analysis of the topics, behavior and image of the leading programs “Times” and “News of the Week”.

course work, added 06/06/2013


Television information programs as an element of reality transformation. Implementation of the European Union audiovisual media policy. Basic audiovisual characteristics of news programs of the Euronews TV channel.

thesis, added 02/11/2013


Introduction to the theoretical foundations of modern news programs. A television program is the result of the work of many specialists. Characteristics of the TV channel "Impulse - Novy Urengoy", analysis of the features of planning and preparation of news information.

course work, added 05/18/2016


Study of theoretical aspects of typology of television programs. Characteristics of the specific features of television. Studying the classification of a television product by functional focus, television genres by sound specificity.

abstract, added 01/03/2015


Analysis of the specifics of television news. Structure of a news program release. Features of the language of the information program. A comparative analysis of the news programs “24 Hours” and “Segodnya” on the Belarusian television channel “STV” and the Russian television channel “NTV”.

course work, added 04/03/2016


Typology of television programs. The originality of travel programs. Travel journalism: characteristic features. Genre differentiation in journalism. Analysis of genre and compositional features of the cycle. Analysis of the work of presenters V. Posner and I. Urgant.

thesis, added 03/14/2015


Analysis of the specifics of cultural and entertainment programs of Soviet television using the example of the programs “Travelers Club”, “Kinopanorama” and “In the Animal World”. Genre palette and originality of the problem-thematic complex of cultural and entertainment programs.

thesis, added 12/01/2017


Techniques for information television broadcasting of the programs “Afontovo News”, “IKS”, “TVK News”. Individuality of each program. Specifics of the work of television journalists in Krasnoyarsk news programs: presenter, reporter, cameraman, director.

The famous TV presenter Boris Notkin has passed away: the body of the 75-year-old journalist was discovered in his house in the Odintsovo district of the Moscow region. An investigative team is working on the spot, the main version is suicide.

According to preliminary data, Boris Isaevich suffered from cancer. A suicide note was allegedly found at the scene, where, in particular, he said: “I am leaving this life voluntarily,” because I am “tired of the torment.”

Popular actors, politicians, athletes, and statesmen came to visit the journalist for an interview on his author’s program “Boris Notkin Invites” on the TV Center channel. The last episode was aired on March 9, 2015 - age and health did not allow working as before, but until the last days, Notkin remained an adviser to the general director of the TV Center channel, Yulia Bystritskaya.

The tragic news took the channel's employees and stars by surprise.

What a horror... was all the host of the “Wife” program Kira Proshutinskaya could say. Later, an obituary appeared - even from the dry official lines it is clear that he was highly valued on the channel: “Boris Isaevich worked on the channel for 20 years - from the very foundation of TV Center.” His programs enjoyed constant success with television viewers. An unsurpassed interviewer, he easily found a common language with all the guests. He was loved and respected by all his colleagues without exception.”

Boris Notkin was born on August 13, 1942 in Moscow, a translator by training, worked at Moscow State University at the intersection of sociology and psycholinguistics. Once he was a synchronized interpreter for director Sergei Bondarchuk, when he worked with the composer of the film “Waterloo” Nino Rota, translated for Franco Zeffirelli... On television since 1986: he hosted the program “Good Evening, Moscow”, “Facing the City”, etc. on MTK (Moscow television channel).

Notkin was known as a merry fellow and an optimist. He loved an active lifestyle: cycling, tennis. He played the latter in pairs with Nikolai Karachentsov - once they had the opportunity to fight with Boris Yeltsin and Shamil Tarpishchev.

He got married, as he himself said, “indecently late” - at 48 years old. But for love, for the sake of which he gave up his amorous exploits, but on occasion he recalled: “before marrying Irina Ivanovna, I was a professional womanizer.” In an interview with Express Gazeta, Notkin said that his wife was a specialist in energy economics, but for her husband’s sake she quit her job and became his personal assistant and stylist. In that same country house, bought with money from the sale of two apartments, they lived happily for 21 years. They had no children.

Dmitry Dibrov - about Boris Notkin: “He was a professor”

Dmitry Dibrov worked with Boris Notkin on the same field for a long time. Today he remembers his departed colleague:

“In recent years, the “scoop” Boris Isaevich was, as they say, “in place.” This was the time when the “120-ruble intelligentsia” felt real power. But when new television began, of course, he couldn’t cope with it. Because he is a “professor” - his manner of conducting the program did not fall into the stylistic floweriness that always accompanies revolutions. And in the 1990s there was a television revolution: “iron sailors” came to the fore, and the “professorship” looked untimely: a quiet voice, an academic manner of being in the frame.

In recent years, we have not seen Boris Isaevich on the screen, because ratings are an inexorable thing. Just as the rating “left” Yuri Mikhailovich Luzhkov from politics, so he “left” his favorite television partner, Boris Isaevich Notkin, from the air. New people have arrived. Good memory, colleague. The wheel of time moves inexorably..."

Boris Notkin invites - Mikhail Zadornov. Mikhail Zadornov visiting Boris Notkin

INTERVIEW

Boris Notkin: A wife is very important! I declare as a former womanizer!

His program “Boris Notkin Invites” (TV Center channel) has been aired on Sundays on TV Center for 24 years. On the eve of the birthday, we talked with the hero of the day

Famous TV presenter Boris Notkin has passed away at the age of 75. He is known to the general public from the TVC channel program “Boris Notkin Invites.”

At the age of 76, the famous Russian journalist and TV presenter Boris Notkin left the world. His body with a gunshot wound to the head was found at home in the village of Rozhdestvenno Odintsovo district near Moscow.

His body was discovered by his wife, who called the police and an ambulance.

A suicide note was found next to his body: “I am leaving this life voluntarily. Tired of suffering", wrote Notkin.

Earlier in May 2017, Notkin was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer.

In the spring, Notkin complained of severe dizziness and weakness. Doctors assessed his condition as serious and admitted him to the hospital. He was diagnosed with cancer. After completing the course of treatment, the TV presenter returned home.

In 1966 he graduated from the translation department of the Institute of Foreign Languages ​​(the current Moscow State Linguistic University), after graduating from 1966 to 1988 he worked at Moscow State University.

In 1972, he graduated from graduate school at the Faculty of History of Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov, defended his dissertation on American historiography.

Translated dialogues between film director Sergei Fedorovich Bondarchuk and composer Nino Rota during their collaboration on the film Waterloo, and translated for Franco Zeffirelli.

In 1989, Literaturnaya Gazeta published an article by Notkin about the ineffectiveness of Soviet medical propaganda. Notkin was noticed and invited to the “Good Evening, Moscow” program as a guest. A week later, Notkin appeared on air again - as the presenter of this program.

In 1989-1994 he was the host of the “Good Evening, Moscow” program on the Moscow TV channel (on Tuesdays).

In 1990-1997, he was the host of the program “Facing the City” (MTK).

In 1997, with the formation of the TV Center channel, he began making the program “Boris Notkin Gallery”. In 1999, the program changed its name to “Grani”; since September 2000, the program again became known as “Boris Notkin Invites.” The program was released until March 2015.

He was nominated for the TEFI television award in 1995 and 1996.

In 2004 he noted: “Television, unfortunately, is very dependent on what is expected of it. Both society as a whole and the ruling elite. Today's ruling elite (by this expression I mean not only the Kremlin, but the entire elite) would absolutely not want to have the television that was ten years ago - democratic and willful. And television meets these needs. Unfortunately, they are long-lasting. But at the same time, television also responds to the mood of the people, who are tired of endless squabbling and want to be reassured rather than upset. But I think the audience will soon pass these moods.”

Boris Notkin invites

In 2007, the program “Boris Notkin Invites” was one of the five most popular on the TV Center channel.

In June 2007, he was awarded the medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, 1st degree, for his great contribution to the development of domestic television and many years of work. In November 2011 he was awarded the Order of Friendship.

In the last years of his life, he regularly published his articles on the pages of the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper, in the “Free Topic” section.

Illness and death of Boris Notkin:

In May 2017, he went to the doctors because he was worried about weakness and dizziness. Doctors came to the conclusion that Notkin’s chronic disease had worsened. The journalist's condition was assessed as serious, and he was admitted to a hospital. The presenter later returned home, but it soon became clear that the journalist had an incurable disease. He was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer.

On November 11, 2017, he was found dead from a gunshot wound in his home in the village of Rozhdestvenno, Odintsovo district, Moscow region. The wife discovered the body; next to it lay a gun, bought two weeks before his death for self-defense.

According to the official representative of the Main Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Moscow Region, Evgenia Kiryushina, “at about 19:00 a message was received about the discovery of a man with a gunshot wound in a private house in the Odintsovo district.” A suicide note was found at the scene of the incident, in which Notkin said that he was tired of the torment and died voluntarily.

Personal life of Boris Notkin:

Was married. He got married late - at 48 years old. Wife - Irina Ivanovna Notkina.

“My wife has a wonderful aura. When she is nearby, studying English or chopping cabbage, I immediately feel good,” he said.

He was fond of tennis. At one time he played in tandem with Nikolai Karachentsov against Boris Yeltsin and Shamil Tarpishchev.

“Together with Nikolai Karachentsov, he fought against Boris Nikolaevich and Shamil Tarpishchev. I had no illusions about Yeltsin. But during the match my hand was still shaking. After all, you are playing against the president of the country! His wife, Naina Iosifovna, aroused my sincere admiration. She carried a huge burden, because her husband was not an easy passenger, but she inspired him, protected him, loved him,” Notkin said in an interview.

He had numerous awards and titles: Order of Friendship (November 16, 2011) - for great services in the development of domestic television and radio broadcasting and many years of fruitful activity; Medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, 1st degree (June 27, 2007) - for his great contribution to the development of domestic television and many years of fruitful work; Medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree (August 30, 1996) - for services to the state, many years of fruitful activity in the field of culture and art, great contribution to the development of mass sports; Medal “Defender of Free Russia” (March 18, 1993) - for the performance of civic duty in defending democracy and the constitutional order on August 19 - 21, 1991; Honorary title “Honored Worker of Culture of the Russian Federation” (May 19, 2003) - for services in the field of culture and many years of fruitful work.