Many of A. S. Pushkin’s contemporaries, who worked in the genre of prose, were characterized by significant pomposity, mannerism, and affectation. Unlike them, Alexander Sergeevich strove to write accurately, briefly and simply. “What can I say,” he said, “about our writers who, considering it base to simply explain the most ordinary things, think to enliven children’s prose with additions and sluggish metaphors. These people will never say: friendship, without adding: “this sacred feeling, whose noble flame” and so on. Thoroughness and brevity are the first advantages
Prose. It requires thoughts and thoughts - without them, brilliant expressions are of no use...”
One of Pushkin’s outstanding prose works is the story “Dubrovsky,” which is based on the real story of the nobleman Ostrovsky, who had a lawsuit for land with a neighbor, who was later forced out of the estate and gradually turned to robbery. In “Dubrovsky,” among other problems, the question of the relationship between peasants and nobles is raised with great urgency. As in most of his prose works, Pushkin vividly and truthfully depicted the life of the landed nobility, and painted a picture of the life and morals of the landed gentry of that time. The critic V. G. Belinsky noted: “The ancient life of the Russian nobility, in the person of Troekurov, is depicted with terrifying fidelity.”
Troekurov is a rich and powerful landowner-serf, spoiled by life, who knows no limits to his willfulness. He demonstrates contempt for the small landed nobles around him, whom the author portrays with subtle humor. The nobles and provincial officials cater to the slightest whims of Kirila Petrovich. He himself “accepted signs of servility as a proper tribute.” Spoiled by his environment and surroundings, Troekurov gave full rein to all his whims, “showed all the vices of an uneducated person.” His usual activities boiled down to traveling around his own estates, long feasts and pranks: “..he suffered from gluttony twice a week and was tipsy every evening.”
The author sharply criticizes the moral character of the noble aristocratic society, creating the image of Prince Vereisky, whose external culture and gloss are combined with a low feudal character. “He had a constant need for distraction and was constantly bored.” Accustomed to always being in society, the prince showed considerable courtesy, especially towards women. Without any doubts or remorse, he persistently seeks marriage with Masha, who loves someone else.
With satirical colors, A.S. Pushkin depicts the “ink tribe” of corrupt officials-hook-makers, who are hated by the peasants no less than the Troekurovs. It would be a picture of a landowner's province. incomplete without these police officers and assessors, without the image of the cowardly Kistenevsky priest, indifferent to the people, and other similar characters.
Among the disgusting picture of landowner life, the image of Dubrovsky, a rebel protesting against slavery and despotism, stands out clearly. This image is close to the images of peasants who are forced by serfdom and the cruelty of the landowners to rebel and revolt. Although Dubrovsky does not become like-minded with the peasants. Probably feeling this, the blacksmith Arkhip deals with the court of his own free will and against the wishes of Dubrovsky. Arkhip does not feel at all sorry for those who perish in the fire and after the massacre declares: “Now everything is fine.”
The poet continued and developed the theme of peasant uprisings, begun in the story “Dubrovsky,” in many of his works, acting as an active defender of the serf peasantry. It was Pushkin who was one of the first to show attention to the serfdom issue, which since the 40s of the last century has become a leading one in advanced Russian literature.
Create similar things:
Essay 6th grade.
Option 1.
The story “Dubrovsky” reflects many of the problems of Russian society that worried Pushkin: the arbitrariness and despotism of landowners, the powerless position of serfs, the unprincipledness of the royal court, the spread of armed resistance among the masses.
Pushkin introduces us to a typical “Russian gentleman” - Kirila Petrovich Troekurov, an uneducated, cruel, arrogant, spoiled man, accustomed to “giving full rein to all the impulses of his ardent disposition and all the ideas of a rather limited mind.”
The customs established in his rich estate are truly terrible. Troekurov, without hesitation, controls the destinies and souls of his serfs. His peasants and servants live much worse than the dogs in the kennel. It is also characteristic that the master loves to cruelly make fun of those around him, since most of all this stupid, swaggering man is amused when people find themselves in a funny situation.
Of course, in such situations they are not at all amused, but they are forced to overcome themselves, fearing to anger the influential and vindictive Kirila Petrovich. I think it is quite natural that in the end Troekurov met a worthy opponent in the person of Vladimir Dubrovsky. It’s just a pity that the young man never brought the matter of revenge to an end.
Option 2
Many of A. S. Pushkin’s contemporaries, who worked in the genre of prose, were characterized by significant pomposity, mannerism, and affectation. Unlike them, Alexander Sergeevich strove to write accurately, briefly and simply. “What can I say,” he said, “about our writers who, considering it base to simply explain the most ordinary things, think to enliven children’s prose with additions and sluggish metaphors. These people will never say: friendship, without adding: “this sacred feeling, whose noble flame” and so on. Precision and brevity are the first virtues of prose. It requires thoughts and thoughts - without them brilliant expressions serve no purpose...”
One of Pushkin’s outstanding prose works is the story “Dubrovsky,” which is based on the true story of the nobleman Ostrovsky, who had a lawsuit over land with a neighbor, was later forced out of the estate and gradually turned to robbery.
In Dubrovsky, among other problems, the question of the relationship between peasants and nobles is raised with great urgency. As in most of his prose works, Pushkin vividly and truthfully depicted the life of the landed nobility, and painted a picture of the life and morals of the landed gentry of that time. The critic V. G. Belinsky noted: “The ancient life of the Russian nobility, in the person of Troekurov, is depicted with terrifying fidelity.” Troekurov - rich and powerful,
a serf-owner spoiled by life, who knows no limits to his willfulness. He demonstrates contempt for the small landed nobles around him, whom the author portrays with subtle humor.
The nobles and provincial officials cater to the slightest whims of Kirila Petrovich. He himself “accepted signs of servility as a proper tribute.” Spoiled by his environment and surroundings, Troekurov gave full rein to all his whims, “showed all the vices of an uneducated person.” His usual activities boiled down to traveling around his own estates, long feasts and pranks: “... he suffered from gluttony twice a week and was tipsy every evening.”
The author sharply criticizes the moral character of the noble aristocratic society, creating the image of Prince Vereisky, whose external culture and gloss are combined with a low feudal character. “He had a constant need for distraction and was constantly bored.” Accustomed to always being in society, the prince showed considerable courtesy, especially towards women. Without any doubts or remorse, he persistently seeks marriage with Masha, who loves someone else.
In satirical colors, A. S. Pushkin depicts the “ink tribe” of corrupt officials-hook-makers, hated by the peasants no less than the Troekurovs. The picture of the landowner province would be incomplete without these police officers and assessors, without the image of the cowardly Kistenevsky priest, indifferent to the people, and other similar characters.
Among the disgusting picture of landowner life, the image of Dubrovsky, a rebel protesting against slavery and despotism, stands out clearly. This image is close to the images of peasants who are forced by serfdom and the cruelty of the landowners to rebel and revolt. Although Dubrovsky does not become like-minded with the peasants. Probably feeling this, the blacksmith Arkhip deals with the court of his own free will and against the wishes of Dubrovsky. Arkhip does not feel at all sorry for those who perish in the fire and after the massacre declares: “Now everything is fine.”
The poet continued and developed the theme of peasant uprisings, begun in the story “Dubrovsky”, in many of his works, acting as an active defender of the serf peasantry. It was Pushkin who was one of the first to show attention to the serfdom issue, which since the 40s of the last century has become a leading one in advanced Russian literature.
Bazarov and Raskolnikov are characters that “belong” to different writers and different books. However, they can safely be called “heroes of the same era.” Both of them exist and operate in the 60s of the 19th century. There is no doubt that Raskolnikov and Bazarov were born and belong to this time, are its spokesmen and its victims. Let us remember that the 19th century was a time when ideas of grandiose social and cultural changes were in the air. More recently, the Great French Revolution took place in France; the Patriotic War of 1812 forced the Russian nobility to look at the structure of their society from a different angle.
The goat is one of the first domesticated animals. Domesticated in the Middle East approximately 9,000 years ago. The ancestor of the domestic goat was the wild bearded bezoar goat (lat. Capra aegagrus), found from the Greek islands in the Aegean Sea through Anatolia, the Armenian Highlands and Western Asia to Central Asia. Most males and females have a beard and the body is covered with straight hair. Its length and quality depend on the breed. For example, Angora goats have long and silky hair, while Kashmir goats are famous for their thick, downy undercoat. The color varies from pure white to dark brown, black and mottled. Horn
As a huge generalization of Pushkin’s experiences of that time, translated into the specifically figurative language of art, the poem “Demons” (1830) arose - a kind of result of Pushkin’s thoughts about the terrible life of Nicholas, Russia. The initial drafts spoke of the traveler in the third person: The traveler rides in an open field The traveler rides in a dark field The traveler rides in a white field In connection with the need to realistically substantiate the traveler’s dialogue in the whitewashed manuscript, We are first appearing, we are riding in an open field - and, finally, finally: I'm driving, driving in an open field. Let's first talk about the road from which the traveler lost his way.
Plan 1. Literature in human life.2. Good poetry is a mystery.a) Is poetry necessary?b) “Love is beautiful and sad.”3. The importance of poetry for a person. When poetry is there, it may not be noticed by some, but when it is not there, people are suffocated. E. VinokurovBooks surround us since childhood. But nowadays, interest in literature, unfortunately, is declining. Reading books replaces the computer and TV. However, it is difficult to imagine our life without books. Most often, if a person likes to read, then he reads prose. Some people love science fiction and detective stories, others love historical and romance novels. Among those reading
In “Cancer Ward,” using the example of one hospital ward, Solzhenitsyn depicts the life of an entire state. The author manages to convey the socio-psychological situation of the era, its originality on such a seemingly small material as an image of the life of several cancer patients who, by the will of fate, found themselves in the same hospital building. All the heroes are not just different people with different characters; each of them is a bearer of certain types of consciousness generated by the era of totalitarianism. It is also important that all the heroes are extremely sincere in expressing their feelings and defending their beliefs, since they find
Many of A. S. Pushkin’s contemporaries, who worked in the genre of prose, were characterized by significant pomposity, mannerism, and affectation. Unlike them, Alexander Sergeevich strove to write accurately, briefly and simply. “What can I say,” he said, “about our writers who, considering it base to simply explain the most ordinary things, think to enliven children’s prose with additions and sluggish metaphors. These people will never say: friendship, without adding: “this sacred feeling, whose noble flame” and so on. Precision and brevity are the first virtues of prose. It requires thoughts and thoughts - without them brilliant expressions serve no purpose...”
One of Pushkin’s outstanding prose works is the story “Dubrovsky,” which is based on the true story of the nobleman Ostrovsky, who had a lawsuit over land with a neighbor, was later forced out of the estate and gradually turned to robbery.
In Dubrovsky, among other problems, the question of the relationship between peasants and nobles is raised with great urgency. As in most of his prose works, Pushkin vividly and truthfully depicted the life of the landed nobility, and painted a picture of the life and morals of the landed gentry of that time. The critic V. G. Belinsky noted: “The ancient life of the Russian nobility, in the person of Troekurov, is depicted with terrifying fidelity.” Troekurov - rich and powerful,
A serf-owner spoiled by life, who knows no limits to his willfulness. He demonstrates contempt for the small landed nobles around him, whom the author portrays with subtle humor.
The nobles and provincial officials cater to the slightest whims of Kirila Petrovich. He himself “accepted signs of servility as a proper tribute.” Spoiled by his environment and surroundings, Troekurov gave full rein to all his whims, “showed all the vices of an uneducated person.” His usual activities boiled down to traveling around his own estates, long feasts and pranks: “... he suffered from gluttony twice a week and was tipsy every evening.”
The author sharply criticizes the moral character of the noble aristocratic society, creating the image of Prince Vereisky, whose external culture and gloss are combined with a low feudal character. “He had a constant need for distraction and was constantly bored.” Accustomed to always being in society, the prince showed considerable courtesy, especially towards women. Without any doubts or remorse, he persistently seeks marriage with Masha, who loves someone else.
In satirical colors, A. S. Pushkin depicts the “ink tribe” of corrupt officials-hook-makers, hated by the peasants no less than the Troekurovs. The picture of the landowner province would be incomplete without these police officers and assessors, without the image of the cowardly Kistenevsky priest, indifferent to the people, and other similar characters.
Among the disgusting picture of landowner life, the image of Dubrovsky, a rebel protesting against slavery and despotism, stands out clearly. This image is close to the images of peasants who are forced by serfdom and the cruelty of the landowners to rebel and revolt. Although Dubrovsky does not become like-minded with the peasants. Probably feeling this, the blacksmith Arkhip deals with the court of his own free will and against the wishes of Dubrovsky. Arkhip does not feel at all sorry for those who perish in the fire and after the massacre declares: “Now everything is fine.”
The poet continued and developed the theme of peasant uprisings, begun in the story “Dubrovsky”, in many of his works, acting as an active defender of the serf peasantry. It was Pushkin who was one of the first to show attention to the serfdom issue, which since the 40s of the last century has become a leading one in advanced Russian literature.
1 option
In his story “Dubrovsky,” A. S. Pushkin touched on MANY pressing social issues that worried progressive educated people of the 19th century. One of them is the powerless position of serfs and the unpunished cruelty and arbitrariness of landowners towards them.
Kirila Petrovich Troekurov is one of the main characters of the story. This rich and spoiled “old Russian gentleman” combines ignorance and arrogance, self-righteousness and cruelty. He lives by the principle “he who is stronger and richer is right.” And since he has no shortage of money, all the neighbors have to put up with the cruel and stupid eccentricities of this idle reveler. Capricious, unrestrained, hot-tempered, “he was used to giving full rein to all the impulses of his ardent temper and all the ideas of his rather limited mind.”
“With the strong, the powerless are always to blame,” so Troekurov’s serfs suffered the most from Troekurov’s whims. While the lord’s favorite dogs were groomed and cherished, “he treated the peasants and servants strictly and capriciously.” Punishments were often unfairly cruel, because serfs were not people for Troekurov.
By telling on the pages of the story about the amusements and customs of the powerful master, A.S. Pushkin thereby exposes and condemns the despotism and arbitrariness accepted in the rich estate, causing justified anger and indignation of the readers.
Option 2
The story “Dubrovsky” reflects many of the problems of Russian society that worried Pushkin: the arbitrariness and despotism of the landowners, the powerless position of the serfs, the unprincipledness of the royal court, the spread of spontaneous resistance of the masses.
Pushkin introduces us to a typical “old Russian gentleman” - Kirila Petrovich Troekurov, an uneducated, cruel, arrogant, spoiled man, accustomed to “giving full rein to all the impulses of his ardent disposition and all the ideas of a rather limited mind.”
The customs established in his rich estate are truly terrible. Troekurov, without hesitation, controls the destinies and souls of his serfs. His peasants and servants live much worse than the dogs in the kennel. It is also characteristic that the master loves to cruelly make fun of those around him, since most of all this stupid, swaggering man is amused when people find themselves in a funny situation.
Of course, in such situations they are not at all amused, but they are forced to overcome themselves, fearing to anger the influential and vindictive arrogant master.
I think it is quite natural that in the end Troekurov received a worthy rebuff in the person of Vladimir Dubrovsky. It’s only a pity that the young man never brought the matter of revenge to completion.
Subject: Condemnation of the vices of society in the story by A.S. Pushkin"Dubrovsky".
Lesson objectives: know the content of the novel; be able to analyze a prose work; be able to compile comparative characteristics of heroes; analyze the actions of the heroes, draw conclusions independently;
develop students’ skills in independently comprehending and perceiving text;
education of moral values; using the example of Dubrovsky’s image to lead to an understanding of such concepts as nobility, justice, honesty.
Planned educational results:
Personal UUD
– expresspositive attitude towards the learning process:
Show attention, surprise, desire to learn more;
– evaluateown educational activities: own achievements, independence, initiative, responsibility, reasons for failures;
Metasubject –
Regulatory:
n accept and save the learning task,
n plan the necessary actions, act according to plan ,
perform self-check or mutual check of the educational task; complete the learning task in accordance with the goal;
Cognitive:
They know the content of the novel and extract the necessary information from the text.
Communication :
Able to present specific content in the form of an oral statement
be able to analyze a work of art, compose a quotation description of the characters, analyze, reason, and draw conclusions independently.
Subject:
Expand your knowledge about the work of A.S. Pushkin, know the biography of the poet, writer, be able to analyze prose text, the history of the creation of the novel “Dubrovsky”, and compose characteristics of the characters.
Lesson type: combined.
Lesson map
Greetings.Teachers are greeted, the duty officer reports absences from class
2. Motivation for students' learning activities.
What happens to a person when he is treated unfairly?
Image of Troekurov. What features are embodied in him? (vices)
How many such Troekurovs were there in Rus'?
What will the topic of our lesson be?
Listen, determine the topic of the lesson
3. Updating knowledge. Setting the goals and objectives of the lesson.
Goal setting.
Who is the conflict between in the novel?
Dubrovsky and Troekurov are representatives of the nobility.
What goals will we set for ourselves?
Quiz based on the novel by A.S. Pushkin “Dubrovsky”.
9. How did Troekurov punish his daughter who threatened him with Dubrovsky? - Locked her in the house.
10. Why did Vladimir decide to burn down his home? “I didn’t want strangers in it.”
11. How did Deforge-Dubrovsky deal with the angry bear? - Killed him.
12.What was the name of the village where the Dubrovskys lived? - Kistenevka.
13. In what city did Vladimir Dubrovsky study? - Petersburg.
14. Why didn’t the gang of robbers take revenge on Troekurov? – Dubrovsky fell in love with Masha.
15. What did Vladimir Dubrovsky give Masha on her last date? - Ring.
16.What animals were used to treat old Dubrovsky? - Leeches, flies.
17. In whose favor was the issue of the Dubrovsky estate resolved in court? - In favor of Troekurov.
18.Where did the papers go, according to which the estate belonged to the Dubrovskys? - Burnt out.
19.Who did the blacksmith Arkhip save during the fire? - A cat.
20. What happened to old Dubrovsky after the arrival of Troekurov, who decided to make peace? - Impact, and then death.
21.Who insulted old man Dubrovsky while visiting Troekurov? - Servant-Houndsman.
22.What happened to the gang of robbers after the defeat of the government troops? – Dubrovsky released them on all four sides.
Goal setting
Answer quiz questions
4. Primary assimilation of new knowledge
Analytical conversation.
What made Vladimir Dubrovsky go against Troekurov?
How did he demonstrate his protest?
Which camp does Vladimir belong to?
A story about popular uprisings.
The history of popular uprisings and the fate of opposition-minded nobles deeply worried Pushkin. His thoughts about popular unrest are reflected in the novel. Vladimir Dubrovsky, a nobleman and officer, relies on the peasants in his protest. They are the only ones who support him. After the fire and the death of the clerks, Vladimir becomes a renegade, and therefore joins the peasants.
They are listening.
Carry out teacher assignments
Construct a speech utterance in accordance with the educational task.
5. Initial check of understanding
Posing a problematic question?
Why does Pushkin portray Dubrovsky Sr. and Troekurov so different?
Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky is a positive hero, Kirilla Petrovich Troekurov is a negative one. I think that with the help of these images the writer shows his ideal of a nobleman. He must have nobility, pride, self-esteem. Pushkin admires the fact that in his youth Dubrovsky refused the help of his influential and wealthy friend Troekurov. He did not want to return his fortune in this way, did not want to lose his freedom: “Dubrovsky, in an upset state, was forced to retire and settle in the rest of his village. Kirila Petrovich, having learned about this, offered him his patronage, but Dubrovsky thanked him and remained poor and independent.”
Vocabulary work.
What do you think is vice?
Moral, spiritual deficiency, negative moral quality of a person.
What is sin?
action or thought, violation , violation of moral and ethical rules, norms established in society. Is an antonym of the word " ».
What vices did Troekurov have?
Dubrovsky?
Master the skill of expressive reading.
Answer questions.
Express and argue their point of view. Make up a quotation description of the heroes.
6.Primary consolidation
Word drawing. Work in groups.
1 gr.: Troekurov;
2nd group: Vladimir Dubrovsky.
Assignment: give a verbal description of the characters, supporting your words with quotes from the text.
In the story "Dubrovsky" Pushkin portrays two types of nobles. They are, by and large, the embodiment of good and evil. On the one hand, the writer draws Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky, a noble nobleman. This is the image of an enlightened person. He is educated, smart, honest and noble. According to Pushkin, because this hero is educated, he has the best qualities of mind and heart. We can say with all confidence that this is the best representative of the nobility.
Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky was a very proud and honest man. Above all, he valued his good name and noble honor. This hero never humiliated himself before anyone, he always spoke the truth to his face. Dubrovsky held himself on an equal footing with Kirila Petrovich Troekurov, who was much richer and more noble than him. Dubrovsky treated his serfs strictly but fairly. He considered them the same people as the nobles.
Next to Dubrovsky, Pushkin portrays Troekurov. He is rich but uneducated. This hero is not worthy of the title of nobleman, so the writer speaks of him as a “Russian gentleman.” Thus, he emphasizes that there were many such Troekurovs in Russia.
This hero was arrogant, rude and cruel: “In his home life, Kirila Petrovich showed all the vices of an uneducated person. Spoiled by everything that surrounded him, he was accustomed to giving full rein to all the impulses of his ardent disposition and all the ideas of his rather limited mind.”
Kirila Petrovich is uneducated. Hence all his vices. Gluttony, drunkenness, cruelty, tyranny - this is an incomplete list of the qualities of this hero: “Despite the extraordinary strength of his physical abilities, he suffered from gluttony twice a week and was tipsy every evening.”
Students work in a group to describe the characters using quotes from the text.
7. Information about homework, instructions on how to complete it
Homework: write a miniature essay “Why does Pushkin portray the nobles so different?”
Write homework in a diary
8. Reflection (summarizing the lesson)
Compilation of the syncwine “Troekurov” and “Dubrovsky”.
Assessment.
Grading.
Make up syncwine. Give ratings and answer questions.
Put notes in the diary
They learn to be critical of their activities.