(Download work)

The "read" function is used to familiarize yourself with the work. The markup, tables and pictures of the document may be displayed incorrectly or not in full!

My opinion about Bazarov

If we talk about my personal perception of the main character of I. S. Turgenev’s novel “Fathers and Sons,” then I must admit that he is my opposite. His character seemed to contain much of what a person can be respected for: intelligence, originality, physical strength, self-confidence, enormous capacity for work. This nihilist beats the aristocrat Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov in a dispute, knows how to force others to listen to himself and respect his point of view. What's the matter, why is he so unpleasant to me? And only then did I clearly understand what repels me in this Turgenev hero: selfishness and pride, lack of pity and kindness towards others.

Evgeny Bazarov is not like other literary heroes I know created by writers of the 19th century. I cannot place Onegin and Pechorin next to him. Perhaps only Chernyshevsky’s heroes Lopukhov and Kirsanov partly resemble nihilists, but even they and the “gloomy monster” Rakhmetov seem to me more humane. Bazarov is also not like other Turgenev characters. The writer himself admits this fact. The hero of “Fathers and Sons” cannot be compared with Rudin and Insarov. Bazarov's personality closes in on itself, because outside of it and around it there are no like-minded people. He is unable to maintain a relationship with the woman he loves; his sincere and integral nature does not give in to compromise and does not make concessions; he does not buy a woman's affection with known obligations. But smart women are usually careful and prudent... In a word, for Bazarov there are no women who can evoke a serious feeling in him and, for their part, respond ardently to it. “A man must be fierce,” Bazarov cites a Spanish proverb - and he’s all about it. Turgenev repeatedly emphasizes his uncontrollable, rough, harsh nature. Even love, passion beats “strong and heavy” in him, similar to malice, and perhaps akin to malice. It is not for nothing that he inspires fear and respect in Odintsova.

Was Evgeny Bazarov born with such a strong nature, inclined to command people, keep them in moral subordination, accept their services, as if doing them a favor, or was it due to the fact that he - “self-made” - achieved everything himself? But, be that as it may, this is the son of a military doctor - a very strong and outstanding personality in all respects. Bazarov recognizes only what can be felt with his hands, seen with his eyes, put on his tongue, in a word, only what can be witnessed by one of the five senses. He reduces all other human feelings to the activity of the nervous system; As a result, the enjoyment of the beauties of nature, music, painting, poetry, the love of a woman does not seem at all higher to him than the enjoyment of a hearty dinner or a bottle of good wine. Bazarov thoroughly knows the natural sciences, with their help he knocked “prejudices” out of his head, but at the same time he remained an extremely uneducated man: he heard something about poetry, something about art, did not bother to think and shoulder-to-shoulder pronounced a verdict on strangers subjects.

Turgenev shows that Bazarov is a democrat, a commoner, a man of labor, alien to aristocratic etiquette and conventions. What is his strength? The fact is that he is a representative of the new time. Aristocrats, like Pavel Petrovich, have outlived their usefulness. New people and new ideas were needed. Evgeny Bazarov throughout the novel

My opinion about Bazarov

If we talk about my personal perception of the main character of I. S. Turgenev’s novel “Fathers and Sons,” then I must admit that he is my opposite. His character seemed to contain much of what a person can be respected for: intelligence, originality, physical strength, self-confidence, enormous capacity for work. This nihilist beats the aristocrat Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov in a dispute, knows how to force others to listen to himself and respect his point of view. What's the matter, why is he so unpleasant to me? And only then did I clearly understand what repels me in this Turgenev hero: selfishness and pride, lack of pity and kindness towards others.

Evgeny Bazarov is not like other literary heroes I know created by writers of the 19th century. I cannot place Onegin and Pechorin next to him. Perhaps only Chernyshevsky’s heroes Lopukhov and Kirsanov partly resemble nihilists, but even they and the “gloomy monster” Rakhmetov seem to me more humane. Bazarov is also not like other Turgenev characters. The writer himself admits this fact. The hero of “Fathers and Sons” cannot be compared with Rudin and Insarov. Bazarov's personality closes in on itself, because outside of it and around it there are no like-minded people. He is unable to maintain a relationship with the woman he loves; his sincere and integral nature does not give in to compromise and does not make concessions; he does not buy a woman's affection with known obligations. But smart women are usually careful and prudent... In a word, for Bazarov there are no women who can evoke a serious feeling in him and, for their part, respond ardently to it. “A man must be fierce,” Bazarov cites a Spanish proverb - and he’s all about it. Turgenev repeatedly emphasizes his uncontrollable, rough, harsh nature. Even love, passion beats “strong and heavy” in him, similar to malice, and perhaps akin to malice. It is not for nothing that he inspires fear and respect in Odintsova.

Was Evgeny Bazarov born with such a strong nature, inclined to command people, keep them in moral subordination, accept their services, as if doing them a favor, or was it due to the fact that he - “self-made” - achieved everything himself? But, be that as it may, this is the son of a military doctor - a very strong and outstanding personality in all respects. Bazarov recognizes only what can be felt with his hands, seen with his eyes, put on his tongue, in a word, only what can be witnessed by one of the five senses. He reduces all other human feelings to the activity of the nervous system; As a result, the enjoyment of the beauties of nature, music, painting, poetry, the love of a woman does not seem at all higher to him than the enjoyment of a hearty dinner or a bottle of good wine. Bazarov thoroughly knows the natural sciences, with their help he knocked “prejudices” out of his head, but at the same time he remained an extremely uneducated man: he heard something about poetry, something about art, did not bother to think and shoulder-to-shoulder pronounced a verdict on strangers subjects.

Turgenev shows that Bazarov is a democrat, a commoner, a man of labor, alien to aristocratic etiquette and conventions. What is his strength? The fact is that he is a representative of the new time. Aristocrats, like Pavel Petrovich, have outlived their usefulness. New people and new ideas were needed. Evgeny Bazarov shows us this new idea throughout the entire novel.

The main place in the novel is occupied by scenes of disputes. Turgenev's heroes reveal their worldview in direct statements, in clashes with their ideological opponents. Bazarov is an independent nature, not bowing to any authority, but subjecting all thoughts to judgment. What is Bazarov's weakness? In my opinion, his main weakness is that he only denies, he does not bring anything positive. How can people live in denial alone? Today, too, you can meet people who perfectly criticize the old, perfectly prove that a lot needs to be changed, but cannot offer anything worthwhile, much less do. And Evgeny Bazarov appropriated to himself the “title” of a nihilist and denies everything: religion, science, family, morality. It becomes especially creepy when you think about the fact that he denies such things as art and love. Of course, life is richer than his ideas, and the “theorist” himself falls in love “stupidly, madly.”

My opinion about Bazarov.

If we talk about my personal perception of the main character of I. S. Turgenev’s novel “Fathers and Sons”,
then I must admit that he is my opposite.
His character seemed to contain much of what a person can be respected for: intelligence, originality, physical strength, self-confidence, enormous capacity for work.
This nihilist beats the aristocrat Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov in a dispute, knows how to force others to listen to himself and respect his point of view.
What's the matter, why is he so unpleasant to me?
And only then did I clearly understand what repels me in this Turgenev hero: selfishness and pride, lack of pity and kindness towards others.
Evgeny Bazarov is not like other literary heroes I know created by writers of the 19th century.
I cannot place Onegin and Pechorin next to him.
Perhaps only Chernyshevsky’s heroes Lopukhov and Kirsanov partly resemble nihilists, but even they and the “gloomy monster” Rakhmetov seem to me more humane.
Bazarov is also not like other Turgenev characters.
The writer himself admits this fact. The hero of “Fathers and Sons” cannot be compared with Rudin and Insarov.
Bazarov's personality closes in on itself, because outside of it and around it there are no like-minded people. He is unable to maintain a relationship with the woman he loves; his sincere and integral nature does not give in to compromise and does not make concessions; he does not buy a woman's affection with known obligations. But smart women are usually careful and prudent... In a word, for Bazarov there are no women who can evoke a serious feeling in him and, for their part, respond ardently to it. “A man must be fierce,” Bazarov cites a Spanish proverb - and he’s all about it.
Turgenev repeatedly emphasizes his uncontrollable, rough, harsh nature. Even love, passion, beats “strong and heavy” in him, similar to malice, and perhaps akin to malice. It is not for nothing that he inspires fear and respect in Odintsova.
Was Evgeny Bazarov born with such a strong nature, inclined to command people, keep them in moral subordination, accept their services as if doing them a favor, or was it due to the fact that he - “self-made” - achieved everything himself? But, be that as it may, this is the son of a military doctor - a very strong and outstanding personality in all respects.
Bazarov recognizes only what can be felt with his hands, seen with his eyes, put on his tongue, in a word, only what can be witnessed by one of the five senses. He reduces all other human feelings to the activity of the nervous system; As a result, the enjoyment of the beauties of nature, music, painting, poetry, the love of a woman does not seem at all higher to him than the enjoyment of a hearty dinner or a bottle of good wine.
Bazarov thoroughly knows the natural sciences, with their help he knocked “prejudices” out of his head, but at the same time he remained an extremely uneducated person: he heard something about poetry, something about art, did not bother to think and shoulder-to-shoulder pronounced a verdict on strangers subjects.
Turgenev shows that Bazarov is a democrat, a commoner, a man of labor, alien to aristocratic etiquette and conventions. What is his strength? The fact is that he is a representative of the new time. Aristocrats, like Pavel Petrovich, have outlived their usefulness. New people and new ideas were needed.
Evgeny Bazarov shows us this new idea throughout the entire novel.
The main place in the novel is occupied by scenes of disputes.
Turgenev's heroes reveal their worldview in direct statements, in clashes with their ideological opponents.
Bazarov is an independent nature, not bowing to any authority, but subjecting all thoughts to judgment.
What is Bazarov's weakness?
In my opinion, his main weakness is that he only denies, he does not bring anything positive. How can people live in denial alone?
Today, too, you can meet people who perfectly criticize the old, perfectly prove that a lot needs to be changed, but cannot offer anything worthwhile, much less do. And Evgeny Bazarov appropriated to himself the “title” of a nihilist and denies everything: religion, science, family, morality.
It becomes especially creepy when you think about the fact that he denies such things as art and love.
Of course, life is richer than his ideas, and the “theorist” himself falls in love “stupidly, madly.”
Maybe some people like such heroes. But for me, a gardener cultivating his small garden, or an illiterate old woman looking after children, are much more “heroes” than Bazarov.
After all, they create to the best of their ability, but he only destroys. How can you break it without even knowing why?
Pavel Petrovich cannot understand this. And Bazarov’s “student” Arkady answers him: “We break because we are strong.”
And force, in his opinion, does not give an account.
It’s this kind of blind “force” that seems very dangerous to me,
Therefore, my attitude towards the main character of Turgenev’s novel is cautiously negative.

My opinion about Bazarov.

Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" was written in 1861.
This novel first appeared in the magazine "Russian Messenger" in 1862.
Critics assessed this novel differently.
DI. Pisarev said: “Turgenev’s new novel gives us everything that we are accustomed to enjoying in his works.”
But another critic, M.A. Antonovich, said that “Mr. Turgenev’s new work is extremely unsatisfactory artistically.”
No matter how much this novel is criticized, I believe that in it I.S. Turgenev fully reveals the current topic not only of his time, but also of all generations. The author cannot calmly look at how “fathers” and “sons” constantly argue, so he writes a novel in which, as mentioned above, he reveals this topic. The main character of the novel "Fathers and Sons" is Evgeny Vasilyevich Bazarov. This is a tall man, with a long and thin face, “with a wide forehead, flat at the top, a book-pointed nose, large sand-colored sideburns.” The face "was enlivened by a calm smile and expressed self-confidence and intelligence." Bazarov studies medicine and loves natural sciences and chemistry.
The reader first meets Bazarov in the scene of Bazarov and Arkady’s arrival at Arkady’s home. Arkady Nikolaevich Kirsanov is a friend and student of Evgeny Bazarov.
Bazarov meets Nikolai Petrovich Kirsanov, Arkady's father, and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, Arkady's uncle.
Arkady answers his uncle's question: "What is Bazarov?" He says that Bazarov is a nihilist, that is, “a person who does not bow to any authority, who does not accept a single principle on faith, no matter how much respect this principle is surrounded.” This means that Bazarov is a person who denies everything. Having read this scene where Arkady tells his uncle and father about Bazarov, I still don’t really understand Bazarov himself. I cannot understand what it means to deny everything, what kind of person Bazarov is.
Next, the author explains to us what Arkady wanted to say about Bazarov.
Bazarov was a lover of women, but “in the romantic sense he called love nonsense, unforgivable foolishness, and considered knightly feelings to be something like ugliness or disease.” He denied love.
Bazarov treats the common people with respect. He sees the people deeply, is able to be with them, believes that the people are equal to them, because he himself comes from the people. Bazarov wants people to learn. At Arkady Bazarov's house he meets the peasants. They talk to him as equals. But when Bazarov arrived at his home, the peasants did not understand him, they laughed at him, because for them Bazarov was a gentleman. They didn't understand what he wanted.
In the Kirsanovs’ house, Bazarov always argued with Pavel Petrovich. They have completely opposite views. It even comes to a duel. Pavel Petrovich does not want to put up with Bazarov. He is looking for any excuse to challenge him to a duel.
I met Bazarov for the first time. He seemed to me a rude, soulless person who did not recognize anything.
But, reading the novel further, I began to understand that Bazarov is not at all what he wants to seem.
Bazarov fell in love with Anna Sergeevna Odintsova. In conversations with her, he tried to show his indifference and contempt for everything romantic, and when left alone, “he was indignantly aware of the romanticism in himself.” Love changed him. He never thought that he could truly fall in love, but he did. Bazarov became more humane, began to care more about other people.
He even began to treat his parents differently.
Previously, he did not like the tenderness of his mother, did not like the fact that his parents were “shaking” over him. But after he fell in love, he began to understand what love is.
As soon as Turgenev began to show Bazarov’s changes, Bazarov immediately dies. And he dies because of just one scratch. He becomes infected with typhus. Thus, the author wants to tell the reader that great people like Bazarov die quickly, without having time to do everything they wanted. Other people take their place, and this continues from generation to generation.
Having read the novel to the end, I discovered a new Bazarov. I realized that Bazarov is a purposeful, grounded person. Despite the fact that Bazarov was a nihilist and denied all principles, he still had them. He hates “aristocrats”, lives according to calculation, guided by attraction, denies empty talk, recognizes people who achieve everything through their work. Bazarov loves the people for their originality, but despises them for their ignorance. He stands for honest people in society. These are all Democratic principles. It is not for nothing that the author himself said about Bazarov that he is “honest, truthful and a democrat to the core.” I agree with Turgenev. And that's why I like Bazarov. If he is a democrat, he will be one until the end of his life. And what I also like about him is that he saw changes in himself and did not deny them.
Turgenev said that when he wrote Bazarov, he felt admiration for him. And when I wrote the scene of his death, I sobbed bitterly. And these were not tears of pity, but traces of an artist who saw the tragedy of a person in whom part of his own ideal was embodied.
Turgenev did not believe that the Bazarovs would be able to lead Russia further, but he also did not believe that the Pavel Petrovichs could do this.
The author wanted to take the positive from some and from others and believed that this was what could give impetus to the development of Russia. But many did not understand him. It turned out that Turgenev himself had to reveal the main idea of ​​the novel.
This means that what a complex and beautiful novel Turgenev created, that it is not so easy to understand. But the author just showed a life that cannot be changed. From this we can conclude that our life is not as easy as it seems.
And Turgenev is a wonderful author who was able to so skillfully reflect complex life situations in his work.
Not every writer can do this.
Therefore, we need to thank Turgenev for his talent, for his love for the people, for whom he tried to write his work, so that they would learn from the mistakes of the heroes and would not repeat these mistakes in their lives.

My opinion about Bazarov

If we talk about my personal perception of the main character of I. S. Turgenev’s novel “Fathers and Sons,” then I must admit that he is my opposite. His character seemed to contain much of what a person can be respected for: intelligence, originality, physical strength, self-confidence, enormous capacity for work. This nihilist beats the aristocrat Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov in a dispute, knows how to force others to listen to himself and respect his point of view. What's the matter, why is he so unpleasant to me? And only then did I clearly understand what repels me in this Turgenev hero: selfishness and pride, lack of pity and kindness towards others.

Evgeny Bazarov is not like other literary heroes I know created by writers of the 19th century. I cannot place Onegin and Pechorin next to him. Perhaps only Chernyshevsky’s heroes Lopukhov and Kirsanov partly resemble nihilists, but even they and the “gloomy monster” Rakhmetov seem to me more humane. Bazarov is also not like other Turgenev characters. The writer himself admits this fact. The hero of “Fathers and Sons” cannot be compared with Rudin and Insarov. Bazarov's personality closes in on itself, because outside of it and around it there are no like-minded people. He is unable to maintain a relationship with the woman he loves; his sincere and integral nature does not give in to compromise and does not make concessions; he does not buy a woman's affection with known obligations. But smart women are usually careful and prudent... In a word, for Bazarov there are no women who can evoke a serious feeling in him and, for their part, respond ardently to it. “A man must be fierce,” Bazarov cites a Spanish proverb - and he’s all about it. Turgenev repeatedly emphasizes his uncontrollable, rough, harsh nature. Even love, passion beats “strong and heavy” in him, similar to malice, and perhaps akin to malice. It is not for nothing that he inspires fear and respect in Odintsova.

Was Evgeny Bazarov born with such a strong nature, inclined to command people, keep them in moral subordination, accept their services, as if doing them a favor, or was it due to the fact that he - “self-made” - achieved everything himself? But, be that as it may, this is the son of a military doctor - a very strong and outstanding personality in all respects. Bazarov recognizes only what can be felt with his hands, seen with his eyes, put on his tongue, in a word, only what can be witnessed by one of the five senses. He reduces all other human feelings to the activity of the nervous system; As a result, the enjoyment of the beauties of nature, music, painting, poetry, the love of a woman does not seem at all higher to him than the enjoyment of a hearty dinner or a bottle of good wine. Bazarov thoroughly knows the natural sciences, with their help he knocked “prejudices” out of his head, but at the same time he remained an extremely uneducated man: he heard something about poetry, something about art, did not bother to think and shoulder-to-shoulder pronounced a verdict on strangers subjects.

Turgenev shows that Bazarov is a democrat, a commoner, a man of labor, alien to aristocratic etiquette and conventions. What is his strength? The fact is that he is a representative of the new time. Aristocrats, like Pavel Petrovich, have outlived their usefulness. New people and new ideas were needed. Evgeny Bazarov shows us this new idea throughout the entire novel.

The main place in the novel is occupied by scenes of disputes. Turgenev's heroes reveal their worldview in direct statements, in clashes with their ideological opponents. Bazarov is an independent nature, not bowing to any authority, but subjecting all thoughts to judgment. What is Bazarov's weakness? In my opinion, his main weakness is that he only denies, he does not bring anything positive. How can people live in denial alone? Today, too, you can meet people who perfectly criticize the old, perfectly prove that a lot needs to be changed, but cannot offer anything worthwhile, much less do. And Evgeny Bazarov appropriated to himself the “title” of a nihilist and denies everything: religion, science, family, morality. It becomes especially creepy when you think about the fact that he denies such things as art and love. Of course, life is richer than his ideas, and the “theorist” himself falls in love “stupidly, madly.”

Maybe some people like such heroes. But for me, a gardener cultivating his small garden, or an illiterate old woman looking after children, are much more “heroes” than Bazarov. After all, they create to the best of their ability, but he only destroys. How can you break it without even knowing why? Pavel Petrovich cannot understand this. And Bazarov’s “student” Arkady answers him: “We break because we are strong.” And force, in his opinion, does not give an account. It is this kind of blind “force” that seems very dangerous to me, which is why my attitude towards the main character of Turgenev’s novel is dangerously negative.