Natalya Altynbaeva

Oblomov in me

Essay

Reading every work where there is a main character, you involuntarily catch yourself thinking that in the habits of this hero there is something reminiscent of your own character traits. Of course, that’s your love for sound, long sleep, delicious food. We see in each specific work the story of the hero, we see where these habits lead him in the end. Perhaps at the first moment of the self-identification process we are scared, then we reassure ourselves that I am not like that, I can improve, I will not ruin my life like that. And in general, it’s not me! Why am I so worried?

But nothing can be done about the truth! In each of us sits our own Oblomov, a part of the calculating Stolz, or, even worse, a quarter of some villain. I recognize Oblomov in myself. It firmly took root in my soul and became a part (and a significant one) of me. How many good ideas are swarming in my head: to study better, to go to college every day in full (!), but these ideas are not destined to come true. The day comes when you want to get some sleep, go somewhere and with someone. And college is not suitable for such a pastime. Then I am faced with a choice. What do I choose? - Sleep and date.

Repentance and pangs of conscience will come later - at the end of the semester or, perhaps, at the end of life.

Oblomov - what sits in us not against our will, we are able to get rid of it. But why should we part with him? Is it bad to at least sometimes lie motionless, staring blankly at the eternal companion of the lonely “Oblomovites” - the TV?

The image of Oblomov and the meaning of the concept of “Oblomovism” were deeply and fully explained by Dobrolyubov in the article “What is Oblomovism?” Oblomov’s main traits are apathy, laziness, and inactivity. The hero is only 32 years old, and he is devoid of any interest in life. All day long he lies on the sofa, contemplating the walls and ceiling. But Ilya Ilyich was not born this way! As a child, he had a lively, inquisitive mind. Oblomov received an education, which opened the way for him in life. He once dreamed of serving Russia, believing that “all life is thought and work, work, although unknown, dark, but continuous.” True, even in his youth he perceived work as a feat.

Oblomov has a “crystal, transparent soul,” as Stolz puts it. He is honest, kind, warm-hearted. Those around him love him. But Oblomov’s main, all-conquering quality is laziness. This laziness grew out of the serf system. Ilya Ilyich was used to getting everything without making any effort - there were servants and serfs to do the work. He is even proud that he has never put on a stocking in his entire life, and the coals in the fireplace have not disturbed him. “I never endured cold or hunger, I didn’t know any need, I didn’t earn bread for myself, and in general I didn’t do dirty work.” “Dirty business” is the lot of the serfs. Oblomov is a gentleman. He believes that this alone makes him superior to others. This opinion was fostered by the owners of Oblomovka, who were confident that Ilyusha Oblomov, a hereditary nobleman and heir to the estate, should occupy a “special” position. But in order to occupy a “special” place, it was necessary to make efforts at the university, in the service. Oblomov did not want to “bother” himself; he did not consider it necessary to work to become like other St. Petersburg officials. It was easier to lie on the sofa and prove your exclusivity to the serf servant Zakhar.

Oblomov thinks in categories learned from childhood in Oblomovka, without revising them or updating them accordingly to changing life. He perceives the life and customs of Oblomovka as the norm, and all other life as “eternal running back and forth.” Oblomov condemns the St. Petersburg bustle because of his own inertia, but objectively he turns out to be right. “What is there to look for? interests of the mind, heart? Look where the center is around which all this revolves: it is not there, there is nothing deep that touches the living. These are all dead people, sleeping people, these members of the world and society are worse than me! ...Aren’t these dead people?..” Oblomov’s words echo Gogol’s assessment of the serf-owners (albeit landowners) in “Dead Souls.”

Oblomov begins to read, but reading tires him. He tries to analyze his life and his character, but in the midst of this introspection he “insensitively”, unnoticed by himself, falls asleep. Oblomov does not want change, he is afraid that “life will not touch him.” He just lies on the sofa and sleeps, and he even “feels sleepy in his dreams.” The dreams that he sometimes indulges in do not go further than a well-fed and calm life. Material from the site

In “Oblomov’s Dream” Goncharov paints an idyll of a patriarchal fortress village. On the one hand, the epic nature of such an existence is emphasized, but at the same time Oblomovka is shown as a sleepy kingdom, and the Oblomovites as sleeping gods. Goncharov talks about those powerful inclinations that Oblomov had, but which forever “fell asleep” without developing. Oblomov turned out to be unnecessary nowhere and to no one, even to himself. “It started with the inability to put on stockings, and ended with the inability to live,” Stolz sums up, and Zakhar exclaims: “Why were you born into the world?” Oblomov is both a product and a victim of conditions and environment. As a victim, he is objectively an accuser of modern society: “Either I didn’t understand this life, or it’s no good.”

In Goncharov’s novel the phenomenon was named “Oblomovism.” In the article “What is Oblomovism?” Dobrolyubov gave an explanation of this concept, showed its origins and character.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page there is material on the following topics:

• me and Oblomov Oblomov in me essay
• the image of Oblomov and the meaning of the concept
• how many serf souls did Oblomov have
• the meaning of the concept of Oblomovism
• concepts acquired by Oblomov in childhood and youth

In the novel "Oblomov" Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov examines such a problem as "Oblomovism", which arose during the period of economic changes in the country. This phenomenon did not allow many people’s talents and inclinations to develop. And people began to appear whose character is reflected by the main character, Oblomov. But there still remained progressive figures such as Stolz, completely opposite to Ilya Ilyich. For me, the image of Andrei Ivanovich Stolts is closer than the image of Oblomov. Let's look at how the author reveals these characters using examples.

Firstly, the heroes are different in origin. Oblomov is from a wealthy noble family. Everyone in his family is used to the fact that the peasants always do everything for them. The atmosphere in the Oblomovs’ house is shown especially vividly in “Oblomov’s Dream”: “Everything is dead, only from all corners a variety of snoring rushes towards everything

"We're good and good."

Stolz is from a poor family, where everyone did all the work themselves.

Secondly, the upbringing of the characters is completely different. Labor for the Oblomov family is torment and punishment. His parents instilled in Ilya a love of peace and sleep. While Andrei Ivanovich’s father taught his son prudence and accuracy, and also instilled a love of activity.

Thirdly, the heroes are distinguished by their lifestyle. Oblomov spends his life on the couch, does nothing, is not interested in anything. Stolz, on the contrary, is constantly on the move. Thanks to his hard work, he became a rich man.

Thus, we can conclude that Stolz is closer to me, because he is a real living person who is used to achieving everything himself.

Updated: 2018-03-21

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.

.